Reference-Dependent Procedural Decision Making∗
نویسندگان
چکیده
We derive, by using the revealed preference method, an individual decision making model that allows for an agent not only to exhibit status quo bias, but also to make use of her default option as a reference point. The resulting model contains elements of the classical rational choice model — indeed it reduces to that model in the case of choice problems without default options — but can also be viewed as arising from a basic choice procedure that involves multiple objectives. Another important feature of the model is that, while it permits status quo bias, it does not necessarily lead to the overvaluation of one’s endowment, and hence it is duly consistent with the absence of a gap between one’s willingness to sell and buy a given choice alternative. JEL Classification: D11, D81.
منابع مشابه
Ranking Efficient Decision Making Units in Data Envelopment Analysis based on Changing Reference Set
One of the drawbacks of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is the problem of lack of discrimination among efficient Decision Making Units (DMUs). A method for removing this difficulty is called changing reference set proposed by Jahanshahloo and et.al (2007). The method has some drawbacks. In this paper a modified method and new method to overcome this problems are suggested. The main advantage of...
متن کاملSurrogate decision making: do we have to trade off accuracy and procedural satisfaction?
OBJECTIVE Making surrogate decisions on behalf of incapacitated patients can raise difficult questions for relatives, physicians, and society. Previous research has focused on the accuracy of surrogate decisions (i.e., the proportion of correctly inferred preferences). Less attention has been paid to the procedural satisfaction that patients' surrogates and patients attribute to specific approa...
متن کاملDecision Support by Interval SMART/SWING - Incorporating Imprecision in the SMART and SWING Methods
Interval judgments are a way of handling preferential and informational imprecision in multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA). In this article, we study the use of intervals in the simple multiattribute rating technique (SMART) and SWING weighting methods. We generalize the methods by allowing the reference attribute to be any attribute, not just the most or the least important one, and by allo...
متن کاملProcedural justice as autonomy regulation.
The present research investigated the relation between autonomy (i.e., freedom of choice) and procedural justice. Three studies tested the hypothesis that people would be particularly sensitive to the fairness of decision-making procedures when they experience deprivation of autonomy needs. Study 1 indicated that procedural justice judgments indeed were influenced more strongly by variations in...
متن کاملAppellate Court Decision Making in NLRB Cases
Abstract: In this article, I review the decisions of the appellate courts in National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) cases over a twenty year period, 1994 to 2014, to ascertain what political, economic and legal factors impact judicial decision making. Unlike many other analyses of appellate decision making, this study makes a deliberate effort to take into account legal and procedural differen...
متن کامل